Indexical Function of Photographic

Question: Discuss about the Indexical Function of Photographic. Answer: Introduction: According to Dzenko (2009), this article explores the ideas on indexical nature of the photographic images. The concept of digital imagery implies that, it has the capability to enhance the quality of traditional images and I completely agree with this. The photographic referent is referred to as a necessary thing placed before the lens of a camera but not the optional thing. The concept of reference of photography and referent are completely different.. In order to resolve the issues regarding traditional photography concept of digital imagery has been introduced. According to the author both terms are relevant to imagination not photography and I agree with this. Non referent imagery has the capability to combine two features such as photography as well as related words (Gillis 2015). Basically, for specific understanding the concepts are utilized in a quality image circle. Visual algorithms, system image and quality models are the frameworks considered for this sort of imagery whi ch is accepted. According to my opinion, yes, I completely agree with this, the concept of digital image has firmly challenged the idea of primitive photography representation as mentioned in the article. The concept of digital imaging has developed in the year between 1960 and 1970 in order to avoid the operational weakness of primitive film camera (Tyner, Kimsroy and Sirik 2015). In fact, the formulation is also termed as image synthesis. I think, the evolutionary process make the photography access easier than others. Therefore, the physical contact with the original images also get reduces in case of digital image processing. Reconstruction, quality improvement and modification become easier in digital image processing (Dzenko 2009). On the other hand, I have also found some disadvantages such as it will eliminate the existence of staff photographers. Camera is referred to as a physical apparatus which is enabling to increase the physiological structure (Gillis 2015). Nowadays, many social platforms rather applications like Instagram, fotologer, jAlbum are invented where people can share their thoughts via images. With the help of geometrical model and mathematical formulae digital images can be defined. Considering the comment provided by Marsh, I have found that, photography is similar to as encapsulation of different sorts of thought in terms of desire (Marsh 2003). The photos can be stored in the physical memory. The sharing process can connect people regardless of time and location of the users. From different survey I came to know that, in last four years the connecting medium has connected more than 220 million users. Yes, according to the ideas provided by Marsh, it is absolutely possible that a photographer has an objective eye. I think that the photo should always contain a truth, fantasy and interpretation. In both digital and analogue photography, a professional photographer always tries to impose the inner idea related to that particular photo (Marsh 2003). A picture is nothing but a container of different kinds of thoughts in terms of fantasy or truth. The measuring image quality holds certain features such as physical images, customized image, technology variables and the perception of the consumers. A professional photographer or an artist is capable to copy his or her thoughts in terms of insight, imagination and creativity. Moreover, I think that in the context of digital and analogue photography it is possible to have an objective eye. References Dzenko, C., 2009 'Analog to Digital: The Indexical Function of Photographic Images', Afterimage, Vol. 37, No2, pp.19-23 Gillis, S.L., 2015. FRBR and TMS: applying a conceptual organizational model for cataloguing photographic archives.VRA Bulletin,41(2), p.7. Marsh, A., 2003 'Introduction' The Dark room: Photography and the Theatre of Desire,Macmillan,South Yara, pp. 13-25 Robins, A., 2014. Peirce and Photography: Art, Semiotics, and Science.The Journal of Speculative Philosophy,28(1), pp.1-16. Rosengarten, R., 2015. Constructing Worlds: Photography and Architecture in the Modern Age.Photography and Culture,8(3), pp.363-367 Schofield, T., Drk, M. and Dade-Robertson, M., 2013, June. Indexicality and visualization: exploring analogies with art, cinema and photography. InProceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Creativity Cognition(pp. 175-184). ACM Schrter, J., 2013. Photography and Fictionality.UCLAJournal of Cinema and media Studies: Mediastudies at: https://www. tft. ucla. edu/mediascape/Winter2013_Photography. html [last consulted: 2014-03-30]. Tyner, J., Kimsroy, S. and Sirik, S., 2015. Landscape Photography, Geographic Education, and Nation?Building In Democratic Kampuchea, 19751979.Geographical Review,105(4), pp.566-580.